Learning Solutions Magazine
     [Forgot Password?]
Your Source for Learning
Technology, Strategy, and News
ARTICLES      
RSS feed RSS feed

Marc My Words: Farewell, Training Magazine

“Perhaps in part it’s the demise of print magazines in general – good or bad; replaced by Websites, blogs, Twitter, and other communications forms we have yet to devise. Perhaps we all have less time to read. But there is no substitute for substance, and at its height, Training had it in spades.”

It was with great sadness that I took note of the recent demise of Training Magazine, and with it, the various Training Conferences. In one form or another, Training Magazine has been around for a long time. The magazine was in its 47th year and the Training Conference had just completed its 33rd annual event in San Diego.

Before there was an eLearning Guild, there was Training Magazine. The Training Conference got its start in New York City and grew to one of the most premiere events in our field. In the late 1990s, the heyday of e-Learning’s emergence as a force to be reckoned with, the Training Conference and the other events sponsored by Training Magazine, were quick to showcase this emerging field. Battered by the dot-com bust and several recessions, the conference grew smaller, but it never lost its drive for innovation.

Training Magazine also made a significant contribution to our field. Back in the ‘80s and ‘90s, the magazine applied some real journalism to the topics of the time. Its editors, Jack Gordon, Chris Lee and others, as well as contributors like Ron Zemke, were unafraid to tackle the tough issues as well as some of the silliness of the training and e-Learning field, and to accept pieces from contributors that made you think. Articles like, “Is ISD Dead?” “A Rabble-Rousing Roundtable,” “The Training Waste Conspiracy,” and “Famous Trainers’ School,” among others, were unprecedented in their directness. Some of the arguments made then are still discussed today. Many people think the magazine lost its edge over the last few years and for many reasons, including the dismal economy and a variety of different owners, it fell on hard times and folded earlier this year. There continue to be rumors that someone will come in and resurrect it, and I hope they are true, but there is no question that the field has lost one of its most strident voices. Too bad.

Perhaps in part it’s the demise of print magazines in general – good or bad; replaced by Websites, blogs, Twitter, and other communication forms we have yet to devise. Perhaps we all have less time to read. But there is no substitute for substance, and at its height, Training Magazine had it in spades.

So, welcome to my periodic column…

Thanks to Bill Brandon, editor of Learning Solutions, and the good folks at The eLearning Guild, I’ve been given the privilege of this wonderful communication outlet. I’ve been around the training, learning, and e-Learning field for more than 30 years (you can Google me if you have nothing better to do), and I’ve written two books: E-Learning and Beyond E-Learning, as well as a bunch of book chapters and articles. I think I have more to say, and I first thought that the time was right for a third book.

But what should I call it? “Way Beyond E-Learning?” “Enough of E-Learning?” “The End of E-Learning?” Or, I could probably do something alphabetical. E-Learning? Been there, done that. M-Learning is taken. I-Learning? Doesn’t Apple own everything that begins with “i?” F-Learning? Not a good idea (sorry, “Formal learning”). Too many other letters – too exhausting.

Take it from me, writing a book is all time-consuming. Maybe there’s another way. So I thought about this column. Here’s a way for me to stay current, to provide insight and commentary, and to invite you to give me feedback, from accolades to rotten tomatoes. So I’m going to give it a shot.

Marc My Words… will appear every month in Learning Solutions. It will present relatively brief commentaries on our field, sniff out new ideas, provide some critiques, reviews, occasional interviews, and more. I’ll try to add a little humor from time to time and offer up some new ways of thinking about what we do. You probably won’t agree with everything, but I hope it will be fodder for some good discussions. What do you think about the state of learning and e-Learning? What pushes your “hot button?” Where do you think we are headed? Let me know.


(73)
I appreciate this article
 RSS feed

Comments

Login or subscribe to comment

Marc, if no one has told you today - you rock! Thanks for pickup up the torch and continue to run with it.
I want to echo the sentiments of others and say I am glad you are continuing on sharing your information and ideas-they are greatly needed and appreciated-keep up the good work!
Marc, been a fan of your for years. So glad you will be writing this column.

I agree about Training Magazine and their wonderful conferences. I learned so much over the years from attending.

Has the honor of attending a small workshop with Ron Zemke on Service Recovery a while back which shaped my practices for years.
Marc, I actually met you at a Training conference back in Denver in '06. You're right about Training Magazine being a significant contributor to our field - I have learned so much over the years from the folks at Training. I will miss the magazine and the conferences.

Very glad to see your column, and I look forward to reading your insights each month!
I didn't get to see Ron Zemke on Service Recovery, but I did buy the book - and used it too! Still remember one of his chapter quotes: "Here's your food. Hope you choke on it." Thanks Ron.
Marc, great to hear of your routine contribution. I remember fondly of our work on Training Test Consultant when I worked at Comware. That seems like a lifetime ago.
Farewell?!! I hear it is back! Marc - Keep up the great work!

Related Articles

Training industry shake-outs in 2010 continue. After 41 years, Training will cease publication in March.
Customers demand more flexibility, less disruption in how training is delivered, and faster, better access. Business demands more frequent updates to training content. Both Training and IT have a vested interest in meeting these demands. Despite their differences, the two groups ultimately have the best interests of the organization in mind and can only succeed when bridges are built between them.
Is instructional systems design (ISD) dead? The arguments against ISD usually center on its perceived inflexibility and the excessive time it takes to go through the process. The arguments for ISD cite its systematic approach and evidence that, if followed, you’re likely to produce more effective training. Maybe there are better questions to ask. Here are four such questions.
Advertise Here
Advertise Here
Advertise Here
Advertise Here
Advertise Here