Your Source for Learning
Technology, Strategy, and News
ARTICLES       RSS feed RSS feed

Spring Revival: Alternate Reality Game Breathes New Life into Old Course

by Ben Betts

January 17, 2011

Feature

by Ben Betts

January 17, 2011

Nick Barclay was a man on a mission: re-define the opening week of the Postgraduate Diploma in Applied Management at Warwick Business School. The Diploma is an entry-level business management qualification targeting the Exec Ed market. Designed to give a solid grounding in business for graduates without a business degree, the course already had a successful seven-year track record, but it was time for an update. Nick stalked the corridors of the business school, keen for new ideas. He was no stranger to experiential learning and when he’d gone looking for ideas for the diploma, one key message had come back to him: gamification.

Gamification is a hotly debated term within the game design community. Many traditionalists believe the term to be derogatory – they feel that claiming that it is possible to change an experience into a game by adding a few features like the right to earn badges is an insult to their art. But, increasingly, it is being seen as an all encompassing term for the implementation of game mechanisms into an experience.

All games are built on a familiar concept; taking the gamer on a journey towards mastery of the task. Games employ different tactics to achieve this. Some act like puzzles to be solved, some give out experience points as a measure of effort and completion; others award medals as part of a recognition package needed to “level up” and progress to higher levels. Gamification works best when it is implemented from day one of development. If you try to shoe-horn these tactics later in development, the result is often messy and nonsensical. It is important to set out to make a game, and then look to make it serious, rather than setting out serious and ending up with a game.

Nick Barclay appreciated all of this and wanted badly to implement such things into his solution, but he had a problem. He didn’t have fifty grand. Bespoke computer games, above all other attributes, are expensive. Nick’s dream solution involved groups of learners playing a game that simulated the complete running of a business while he pulled the strings behind the scenes. Nothing available “off-the-shelf” was up to the task; the games were either far too simplistic, or perversely, far too complex. For his budget this simply could not be done. Or so he thought until I introduced the concept of the Alternate Reality Game, or ARG.

A brief explanation of the Alternate Reality Game concept

ARGs create a fictional scenario in which your learners interact with people and information to play out a story in the form of a game. Imagine a role-play on steroids, where the participants don’t have to pretend to be anyone else, it’s the world around them that changes. For learners immersed in an ARG, it becomes increasingly difficult to define what is actually real and what is faked. For example, you might give your participants a task that will involve them researching something online. You know they will almost certainly Google for the answer, so you’ve rigged the system so that a Website of your creation comes up first for the term they will search for. This game is as real as it gets. Participants in an ARG can take actions and approaches they might be too afraid to pursue in the real-world. But an ARG is an environment for safe-failure and experimentation.

ARGs grew up as a part of viral marketing campaigns, but today they are increasingly popular in the world of learning. However, I hadn’t heard of a face-to-face course that was previously delivered in a lecture/seminar format being converted into an ARG. This didn’t stop Nick going for it; the idea appealed to him too much to let it lie. What was even better was the price tag; less than a tenth of the cost involved in building a computer game.

Building the experience

The induction week of the diploma is an immersion week, designed to get participants fired up to learn more about the models and theories that they need to leverage in order to create better businesses. As such, we had almost free-range to craft an experience that would highlight the need for participants to know more about marketing, finance, operations, and strategy. Initially we formed the basis of the narrative around a case study scenario; a failing water cooler company in need of rescue. We took this premise and made it epic; jobs would be lost, lives ruined, and a town left destitute if the participants failed to save the company during the course of the game.

The game would be played over the course of four days of the five-day induction week. HT2 (the author’s company) would act as remote puppet masters; controlling telephone lines, e-mails and other Web-based assets, while Nick and his colleague Mark would act as puppet masters “on the ground,” manipulating the game in response to players actions and responses. While the case study acted as a foundation for the game, we were flexible enough to change the environment as we needed to push participants in a certain direction.

We worked hard to make our ARG a “fully-realized world;” the company in question had a Website that worked, with links to other Websites that really existed (see: http://www.campdensprings.com/). Employees had e-mails that worked and that were responded to “in character.” Workers also had exposure elsewhere on the internet; Twitter, LinkedIn, Facebook, and personal blogs were all included. While all of this involved a level of effort to set up, none of it cost any real money. The company’s Websites were built with WordPress; the telephone number was actually a Skype number to be answered on my laptop, the social network presences were all free of charge. We took time over developing our key characters, making sure their names were realistic but unique so that if our participants were to search for them, our entries would come up first (try Rebecca Dellingford). All of this online work was augmented with real-life actors brought in to play select company roles in the face-to-face environment as and when we required their intervention.

Running the ARG

On the first day of the ARG, participants were shown a “flash forward” video that showed the potential future of the company: bankruptcy and disaster. Split into groups, the participants were then issued a brown paper envelope with a USB thumb drive inside. The thumb drive had a range of materials on it, including a briefing from the chairman of the company, detailed company information, and a range of additional services that they could purchase, should they need a helping hand to piece the story together.

The teams then had three days to put together a rescue plan in time for a big presentation to the board on the fourth day. They needed to research, to question, and to analyze their findings to come up with a coherent plan of action. As they researched and probed, further new clues were unveiled that helped participants to piece the story together. At the end of each day the teams were pitted against each other in games designed to expose elements of each team’s knowledge to the rest of the group. Many of the clues we left utilized QR codes as a means of communication. QR codes are 2-D bar-codes; square patterns that are readable by smartphone apps and can store information like a Website URL. None of the participants had, to their knowledge, seen one of these QR codes before. By the end of the first evening one of the groups figured out that what the QR codes were, captured one and used it to find an “employee’s” Facebook profile. By day two, all of the groups knew what they were.

All of this amounted to a hugely immersive induction week to the Diploma. Running the experience was busy, fast moving, and fun according to Nick, but he also thought the format really excelled because it was both exciting and capable of being flexed in real-time. Participant feedback was stunning, with players commenting that they really enjoyed “discovery through doing,” which helped to highlight things not always seen in traditional style courses. Others commented that the experience was “very refreshing;” that they “really learned a tremendous amount,” found the ARG “extremely enjoyable” and “very realistic,” and that the whole experience “challenged you to think in different ways.” The winning team also had the honor of becoming the namesakes of our ARG: Spring Revival.

I firmly believe that this approach to game-based learning is both affordable and sustainable. We’ll be running the ARG again for the next cohort of participants at Warwick Business School in the coming months and we fully expect the second play-through to be even better than the first.


Topics Covered

(72)
Appreciate this!
Google Plusone Twitter LinkedIn Facebook Email Print
Comments

Login or subscribe to comment

Thanks, Ben, for sharing this experience with us.

I am wondering about the social media profiles of the characters. What pertinent information were the players to find on their Facebook and LinkedIn profiles?
Thanks Ryan.

It varied. For instance, one employee had a Facebook profile with very poor privacy settings, so it exposed a lot of chatter about the "grass root" problems of working for the company.

Perhaps just as significant was the ability to see where friendships were within the senior mgt - for instance a couple of the characters were clearly good friends with each other, whilst others were made reference to as being well outside this clique.

Another claimed to be a bit of a guru when it came to social media, but they were obviously quite limited in their implementation.

A couple of teams created their own "team" profiles on Facebook, gave friend requests with the staff and then started less formal conversations than they would perhaps put on email. A few of them even started sympathising with them in order to get more information out of them!
What about facebook's policy that forbid fake profiles?
How many "puppet-masters" participated in the learning event?
RE: Puppetmasters. 1 with overall oversight (online only, no physical presence), 2 interacting directly (but more to listen than control).

RE: Facebook Policy. Great question. Technically, we could be seen as in breach of this (specifically, 'Profiles that do not represent a real person', which is 1 of 5 categories of fake profile which Facebook highlights on this page: http://www.facebook.com/help/?faq=12256&ref_query=fake+profi).

In actuality the policy, as I read it, is more to protect slanderous / false representation. We aren't passing off other people's personae; for all intents and purposes we are the only incarnation of that person and for the duration of our game that person is as real as you or me.
This is great Ben! I'm seeking a grant to look at mlearning with a group of disengaged youth. This article has helped very much, particularly in having me think "outside the square". May I contact you further for discussion? How can I be in touch with Nick Barclay please?
Jenni Wright
goingyourway [at] fastmail.fm
Hi Ben.

Great article!
While still working at Sun Microsystems, a colleague (Brandon Carson, then my manager) and I collaborated on the creation and implementation of an ARG for learning. It was quite a nice experience to be able to bring in live narrative and media elements while having the learners engage in conversation via social media.
Here is a link to that article which we published here on Learning Solutions sometime ago. We discuss challenges and successes in designing/implementing the game: http://www.learningsolutionsmag.com/articles/134/args-leverage-intelligence-improving-performance-through-collaborative-play/page2
This is a great article, thanks for sharing. I'm in the middle of a similar project for the Florida Council on Economic Education teaching ethics in business decision-making. We used the Conducttr storytelling platform to manage all our characters emails and social media interactions. You can check it out at www.tstoryteller.com. It's perfect for this type of storytelling.
Related Articles